Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 294 days older than the cheaper Core i5-12400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 0% better in Valheim than Core i5-12400 - 215 vs 214 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €155.05 vs €188.75
- Up to 18% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11600KF - €0.72 vs €0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
215
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.88/FPS
81%
Price, €
€188.75
82%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4111 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
214
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€155.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €155.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |