Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 238 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 159 vs 153 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €121.46 vs €188.75
- Up to 34% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-11600KF - €0.79 vs €1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.19/FPS
66%
Price, €
€188.75
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3465 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
153
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €121.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3465 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Renoir |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |