Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-10600K - 177 vs 167 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €164.99 vs €188.75
- Up to 7% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-11600KF - €0.99 vs €1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
92%
Price, €
€188.75
87%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12975 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
167
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€164.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €164.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12975 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |