Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 264 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 7 2700X - 235 vs 231 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - €152.28 vs €158.88
- Up to 3% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i5-9400F - €0.66 vs €0.68 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
231
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€152.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €152.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |