Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €109.7 vs €141.58
- Up to 21% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-10400F - €0.42 vs €0.53 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-4670K - 267 vs 262 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 12 vs 4 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
262
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€109.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €109.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3943 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
267
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
79%
Price, €
€141.58
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €141.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3943 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |