Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2151 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - €109.7 vs €128.88
- Up to 14% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-9100F - €0.66 vs €0.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-4670K - 167 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 65 vs 84 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
165
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€109.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €109.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
85%
Price, €
€128.88
85%
FPS Winner
Buy for €128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670K | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |