Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600K is 1696 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - €60.9 vs €148.88
- Up to 58% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-2600K - €0.52 vs €1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G3900 - 120 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
118
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17848 minutes ago
Buy for €148.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17848 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |