Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 273 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - €60.9 vs €188.88
- Up to 67% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-6900K - €0.52 vs €1.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G3900 - 121 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
117
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.56/FPS
33%
Price, €
€188.88
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |