Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $176
Availability
MSRP in USD: $176
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 2063 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-650.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-650 - 211 vs 207 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i5-650 - 51 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Up to 83% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - €10.38 vs €60.9
- Up to 83% better value when playing Battlefield V than Celeron G3900 - €0.05 vs €0.29 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14292 minutes ago
BQTEC Intel Core i5-650 3.20 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 4 MB Cache 73 W CPU Processore LGA 1156
Buy for €10.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14292 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i5-650
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-650 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Clarkdale |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
