Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 3026 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 13% better in Minecraft than Core i7-2600K - 704 vs 622 FPS
- Up to 20% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - €122.66 vs €152.66
- Up to 32% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i7-2600K - €0.17 vs €0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €152.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4350 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
704
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €122.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4351 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2600K | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |