Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 32% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Celeron G1610 - 78 vs 59 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Celeron G1610 - €1.5 vs €1.51 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - €88.88 vs €117.34
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
78
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.34
75%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €117.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |