Buy on Amazon
€203.76
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $313
Availability
MSRP in USD: $313
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770K is 218 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G1610 - 129 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - €72.66 vs €203.76
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 55 vs 77 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-3770K Processore (3,5GHz, L3 Cache, Sockel 1155)
Buy for €203.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74483 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74483 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3770K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
60.25459688826026%
Multi-Core
739
29.931146213041714%
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 77 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
