Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 973 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 2% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 295 vs 290 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €200.0 vs €379.64
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66729 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
290
98.30508474576271%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€379.64
52%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66730 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Single-Core
1168
81.22392211404728%
Multi-Core
5794
100%
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |