Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 989 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900 - €141.58 vs €375.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 9 7900 - €0.59 vs €1.44 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-10400F - 261 vs 242 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
242
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€141.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €141.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15256 minutes ago
Buy for €375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |