Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3900 - 172 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - €60.9 vs €144.68
- Up to 57% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-7100 - €0.36 vs €0.84 per FPS
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €144.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
167
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |