Buy on Amazon
€72.58
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 514 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G1610 - 237 vs 229 FPS
- Up to 0% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - €72.58 vs €72.66
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel BX80646I34150 Core i3-4150 Processore, 3M Cache, 3.50 GHz, FC-LGA12C, Boxed
Buy for €72.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 263 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 259 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
40.92219020172911%
Multi-Core
739
36.10161211529067%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
