Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4150 is 488 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3900 - 117 vs 112 FPS
- Up to 69% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - €19.0 vs €60.9
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4150 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75927 minutes ago
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75926 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
55.81171950048031%
Multi-Core
992
48.461162677088424%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |