Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 730 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4130 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 3% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G3900 - 161 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - €18.15 vs €60.9
- Up to 72% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G3900 - €0.11 vs €0.39 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8408 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €18.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8409 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |