Buy on Amazon
€88.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240T outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240T is 91 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Performs up to 0% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1610 - 234 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
233
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
