Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 4100 outperforms Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 4100 is 3500 days newer than Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 4100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 4100
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-3240T - 159 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 8 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €74.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75908 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
30.121293800539085%
Multi-Core
971
20.650786899191832%
Intel Core i3-3240T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 4100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |