Buy on Amazon
€80.56
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms Core i3-3227U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 77 days older than Core i3-3227U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 17 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i3-3227U - 190 vs 188 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3227U - 8 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€80.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3,3 GHz a otto core 8M Processor Socket AM3+ CPU 95W Pacchetto di massa FX-8300 SENZA VENTOLA
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-3227U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3227U | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
