Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF and the more expensive Core i3-10320 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 12% better in League of Legends than Core i3-10320 - 201 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €136.32 vs €151.33
- Up to 19% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i3-10320 - €0.68 vs €0.84 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10866 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€136.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €136.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10866 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |