Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 8% better in HITMAN 2 than Core i5-4670K - 149 vs 138 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €109.7 vs €151.33
- Up to 23% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Core i3-10320 - €0.79 vs €1.02 per FPS
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
77%
Price, €
€151.33
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15283 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
138
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€109.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €109.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15284 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |