Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - €159.18 vs €190.43
- Up to 12% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-11500 - €0.89 vs €1.01 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-10320 - 188 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
94.68085106382979%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€159.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €159.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
88.11881188118812%
Price, €
€190.43
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for €190.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
77.10420841683366%
Multi-Core
4626
62.3114224137931%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |