Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - €151.33 vs €161.92
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 10% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-10320 - 389 vs 353 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i3-10320 - €0.42 vs €0.43 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10796 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
389
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€161.92
93%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €161.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10796 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |