Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3399 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 16% better in New World than Core i7-2600K - 117 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 12% better value when playing New World than Core i7-2600K - €1.29 vs €1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €148.88 vs €151.33
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.33
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12960 minutes ago
Buy for €148.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12960 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |