Buy on Amazon
€159.18
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-13100F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-13100F is 979 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than Core i3-10320 - 159 vs 152 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €90.17 vs €159.18
- Up to 46% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i3-10320 - €0.57 vs €1.05 per FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
152
95.59748427672956%
Value, €/FPS
€1.05/FPS
54.285714285714285%
Price, €
€159.18
56%
Intel Core i3-10320 (fase base: 3,80 GHZ; attacco: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box, BX8070110320
Buy for €159.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Core i3-13100F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€90.17
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ 13ª generazione i3-13100F Desktop Processore (4 Core), 12 MB di cache, fino a 4,5 GHz, LGA1700)
Buy for €90.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i3-13100F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1539
67.55926251097453%
Multi-Core
4626
59.759720966283425%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
