Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 614 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-10320 - 192 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €78.8 vs €151.33
- Up to 49% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-10320 - €0.41 vs €0.8 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16605 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16605 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |