Buy on Amazon
€151.33
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 7 2700X - 123 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €122.56 vs €151.33
- Up to 17% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i3-10320 - €1.02 vs €1.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
123
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
82%
Price, €
€151.33
80%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i3-10320 (fase base: 3,80 GHZ; attacco: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box, BX8070110320
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
120
97%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122.56
100%
Value Winner
AMD Wraith Prism LED RGB Ventola di raffreddamento del processore Ryzen 7 2700X AM4/AM2/AM3/AM3+Connettore a 4 pin Base in rame/Dissipatore di calore in alluminio, Computer desktop
Buy for €122.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 67 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
