Buy on Amazon
€379.64
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 215 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than Celeron G4900 - 223 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
223
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen ™ Threadripper 1900X, S TR4, 8 core, 16 fili, 3,8 GHz, 4,0 GHz Turbo, 20 MB, 64 linee, 180 W, CPU, vendita al dettaglio
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17236 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
