Buy on Amazon
€255.26
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 2106 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 6% better in Stray than Celeron G4900 - 189 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD AM5 Ryzen 7 8700G Box 3,8GHz MAX 5,1GHz 8xCore 16xThreads 24MB 65W
Buy for €255.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75400 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Ryzen 7 8700G
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
22.933730454206998%
Multi-Core
1051
7.3832103969090275%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8700G |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Celeron G4900 or Ryzen 7 8700G
Stray, 1920 x 1080, High
55 FPS
€14.16/FPS
Radeon 780M
Ryzen 7 8700G
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€779
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
