Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 1078 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 79% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G4900 - 461 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Core i7-11700F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
29.31937172774869%
Multi-Core
1051
11.956769055745164%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
