Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2543 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 3% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Celeron G1610T - 304 vs 295 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 4 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
304
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |