Buy on Amazon
€89.94
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $99
Availability
MSRP in USD: $99
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2699 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 17% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1610T - 269 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 8 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 3 3100
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
269
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 Processore (4C/8T, 18 MB Cache, 3.9 GHz Max Boost)
Buy for €89.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 3 3100
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
