Buy on Amazon
€77.34
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600S outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2600S is 694 days older than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600S - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600S
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G1610T - 128 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 8 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2600S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Processore Intel Core I7-2600S I7 2600S I7 2600 S 2,8 GHz Quad-Core Eight-Core 65W CPU LGA 1155
Buy for €77.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i7-2600S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i7-2600S |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
