Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2699 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 17% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G1610 - 238 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - €88.88 vs €177.47
- Up to 41% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 3 3100 - €0.44 vs €0.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Buy for €177.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13181 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
203
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Matisse | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |