Key Differences
In short — Pentium G4400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Pentium G4400 is 1002 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 51% cheaper than Pentium G4400 - €88.88 vs €181.13
- Up to 49% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium G4400 - €0.59 vs €1.15 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1610 - 157 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
150
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2319 minutes ago
Buy for €181.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2319 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |