Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2023 days newer than the more expensive Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 28% better in World of Warcraft than Pentium G4400 - 206 vs 161 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Pentium G4400 - €163.5 vs €181.13
- Up to 30% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Pentium G4400 - €0.79 vs €1.13 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 12 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €181.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13347 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€163.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €163.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13348 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G4400 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |