Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3990X outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is 79 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Performs up to 17% better in Overwatch 2 than Athlon 3000G - 391 vs 333 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
333
85.16624040920716%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €78.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2392 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
61.42490372272144%
Multi-Core
1975
14.204545454545455%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Athlon |
Castle Peak | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |