Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 3990X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 697 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 128 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 10% better in League of Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X - 184 vs 168 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
184
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2513 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 7th, 2020
Single-Core
1558
97.19276356830942%
Multi-Core
13904
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 2 |
128 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |