Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1051 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - €81.67 vs €144.68
- Up to 42% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i3-7100 - €0.49 vs €0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-7100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 4% better in No Man's Sky than Athlon 3000G - 172 vs 166 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
166
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.49/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Buy for €144.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |