Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 211 days older than the more expensive Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Athlon 3000G - 121 vs 116 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €128.88 vs €132.0
- Up to 6% better value when playing Elden Ring than Athlon 3000G - €1.07 vs €1.14 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €132 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€128.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |