Buy on Amazon
€74.44
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 482 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - €74.44 vs €134.97
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 6% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Athlon 3000G - 133 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD Athlon 3000G Processore con grafica Radeon Vega 3 (2C/4T, orologio base da 3,5 GHz)
Buy for €74.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74587 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-10105 - Processore desktop di 10° generazione (frequenza di base: 3,7 GHz, Turbo boost: 4,4 GHz, 4 core, LGA1200) BX8070110105
Buy for €134.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74585 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
64.35776731674513%
Multi-Core
1975
42.850943805597744%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
