Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1773 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €24.38 vs €379.64
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than FX-4300 - 271 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €24.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75961 minutes ago
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75962 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |