Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - €24.38 vs €424.99
- Up to 87% better value when playing F1 23 than Ryzen 7 7800X3D - €0.17 vs €1.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 114% better in F1 23 than FX-4300 - 314 vs 147 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €24.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7378 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
314
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.35/FPS
12%
Price, €
€424.99
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for €424.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7378 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | No |