Buy on Amazon
£163.75
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2725 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon X5650 - 169 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 16 vs 12 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
169
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.97/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Processor - (8 Core/16 Threads) - YD190XA8AEWOF
Buy for £163.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon X5650
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
