Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 3076 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3520
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 4% better in The Outer Worlds than Xeon W3520 - 202 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 16 vs 8 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
202
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.81/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £163.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Bloomfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |