Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 2285 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3520
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 6% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon W3520 - 123 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 91 vs 130 Watts
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
123
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.22/FPS
100%
Price, £
£150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 91 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |