Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 4131 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 12% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon W3520 - 354 vs 317 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
354
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.51/FPS
100%
Price, £
£180.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £180.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Renoir |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | No |