Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 3139 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700K - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 21% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5620 - 216 vs 178 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i7-9700K
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
